Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts

June 6, 2020

Reading Is Protest

Racism is comprised of countless facets. Facets of oppression, power, controlled infrastructure, restricted and limited opportunities and resources. Protesting against all its abhorrent angles is also dimensional. As we witness an unsettling, hideous history unfold in all of its cacophony of confusion and brutality, it's evident that the display of resistance and solidarity isn't a one-size fits all, and that accentuating all the positives becomes key in a time of crisis and division. 

Toni Morrison notes in her excellent essay "Peril" (from 2019's The Source of Self-Regard) that there are three human responses to the perception of chaos: naming, violence, and stillness. The latter is not to be confused with passivity, but the stillness in art, in the creation of. Being a writer, I'm aware of the power the pen and keystrokes posses, but the reading of such words is just as potent and proactive as taking to the streets to raise fists skyward. 

Reading --- of books, of newspapers, of websites, specifically --- allows us to respond with stillness. To sit, absorb, and apply words for tangible thought. No comment boxes, no click-bait headlines, just you and lines and lines of words, words that cultivate ideas, histories, and worlds. Flip pages, scroll, swipe left, and curiosity and knowledge are ignited. Reading is an constant ignition switch for knowledge and for change. Its why autocratic governments despise and dispel the practice of reading and spreading information, why the free press and free speech are often the first causes of contention as these practices derail their game plans for systematic oppression and controlled conformity. The ol' 'you speak what I say you should speak, you act as how I say you should act'. Once you find different ways to speak, its difficult to fall in a singular line.

It isn't lost on me how my ancestors, slaves, were barred from and were brutalized for reading, and acquiring an education. It was nothing short of a crime to even posses a book, much less write one. The methodical execution of racist laws, the instillation of fear of the written word was all to hinder generations of being educated and aware of their existence. The effort was to have them "not exist", to erase them as a culture, as a people, all to maintain one kind of supreme racial, social, and economic control. Placing books in the hands of slaves was a defiance to their captivity. Books signified freedom. Reading a book taught one how to learn and say words, and use them to free and reclaim themselves. 

As the decades go on, where the 19th Century still bleeds into the 21st Century, interest in the preservation and practice of reading in the United States has dwindled. America (in muddled fashion) "elected" a treasonous, bigoted bunker-dwelling creature of ill-intelligence to reinforce such a decline, almost as a chest-thump affirmation for ignorance and illiteracy. It used to be shameful to say you couldn't read, now it's a source of some weird alter-pride where the abuse of words, the abuse of books, even sacred texts, using them as (upside down) props for nefarious and narcissistic gains is almost lauded. You'd raise eyebrows over some of the individuals I've come across who've proudly told me they don't read, never liked reading, or find it a "boring intrusion". A surprising number of them proclaimed they wanted to --- get this --- write books. Stephen King has some things to say about that dizzy contradiction (see point #8).

Reading, books, language, writing --- these are treasures to be persevered and practiced, used as mechanisms of human connection, survival, and resistance. Now more than ever we need to engage in reading, in the creation and stillness of art. This to comprehend and understand where we're coming from --- and where we're going to. Reading has been the one thing to keep my head above the swill of raging waters as a pandemic persists, political chaos commences, revolutions are televised, and America addresses for the umpteenth time its original sins of racism, and the denial and unjust extermination of Black lives. 

Reading, writing, and creation --- these are my contributions that maintain my existence as a Black woman in America. It's my response, my protest, my resistance towards the powers, and the ills that be.

...and yet we all must be thoughtful what we read and consume in this time of turbulence. Amid chaotic uncertainty, where a lot of words, ideas and opinions are thrown around, the challenge is to carve clarity and positive productivity from them. Thus, read widely and diversely. Read authors of different races, genders, sexualities, from variant cultures, religions, and regions. Read fiction. Read non-fiction.  Read what speaks to you, read what speaks up for you. Read to practice self-care. Read out of your comfort zone. Read to be aware of where you stand in these moments, in this life.  

Stay safe. Stay informed. Stay protesting. Stay reading. 
✊🏿✊🏾✊🏽

October 5, 2018

Choices


The harpoon moment during the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice occurred when California Senator Kamala Harris asked nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh if there were any laws, on the books, that give the government power to protect the male body. With this question she was met with a furrowed brow, some beads of sweat, and not a clear answer. She repeated the question, and Kavanaugh, assembling the few brain cells he possesses, replied thus: "I'm not thinking of any right now."

This exchange lets us know three things: 1) Harris is one bad mutha, and deserves to be a Senate majority leader, 2) Kavanaugh is an unqualified sexist assclown, and 3) it's 2018 and this is where we are. We are in a time where a senator has to pose a question like this, and that the question is met with pause, with a dumbfounded look, and with a muddled non-answer. If anything, this disqualified him for me, this even before all that would emerge about Kavanaugh in the coming weeks. It was a simple "yes or no" question, "no" being the answer, but it was his lack, his reluctance at saying this, pissed me off.

There are numerous things that make Kavanaugh unfit for the Supreme Court (and a lot of it goes beyond the scope of just his opinions on Roe v. Wade and women's bodies), but the strongest stench that permeates off of him is his utter disdain and disinterest of women, and the frenetic need to control said women. I don't care if he has a wife and two daughters, or that his staff is comprised of all-women. Hitler had a mother, and a girlfriend, and women who followed him throughout the Nazi regime. There is no such thing as a "good sexist".

Pushing aside a lot of the ugly that occurred during, and in the aftermath of a hearing where a woman had relay the most traumatic moment of her life to a prying audience of strangers, and an Angry White Man who conveniently made himself the victim made me return to a read that made one of the deepest impressions on me last year. So I write this on the eve of the assured confirmation (barf) for Kavanaugh, and wonder still: will we ever get to a point where women and their bodies are left the fuck alone?

Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights, by The Nation writer, Katha Pollitt didn't have to convince me of anything, even at the time of reading it. I have a fierce belief that women, from all walks of life, deserve choices and to rule their lives the way they see fit. I'm against patriarchal-driven governments and churches, and rooms filled with avaricious white men making decisions towards people and matters they know nothing about, and choose to know nothing about when it's all said and done. Pollitt didn’t need 272 pages to convince me that pro-choice is a balm to aid a bulk of our societal ills or that "abortion opponents" (her wording) have ill-informed, insincere thinking, and yet, she converted me, a 100xs over converted, confirmed, and made me stand stronger in my convictions that pro-choice is what I believe.

So why are others so feverishly against abortion? To quote Janet Jackson: "cause it's all about control" --- but control of what?

Pro takes on the heft of such a question and outlines how abortion opponents, and even some defenders, use their words as weapons to terrorize and hold women hostage within their own bodies, and how there are layers to how society as a whole punishes, controls, and shames women ---- particularly women of color, and women who live in a poorer class bracket. Though its a book preaching to the pro-choice choir, Pro is mostly written for the "muddled middle", those who sit on the fence about reproductive rights, or don't think two ways about it. Pollitt dispels a lot of doubt, and puts forth a lot of potent truth, as she gives clear and reasoned arguments to time-worn conspiracy theories and junk science, making sense of what "pro-life" is, what stokes people's fears about legal abortions, and how we should re-frame the concepts of sex, childbirth, and motherhood for the sake of our future.